Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01586
Original file (BC 2013 01586.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-01586

	XXXXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 13 Dec 11 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had an undiagnosed medical condition prior to the contested FA, which precluded him from obtaining a satisfactory overall rating.

In spite of regular workouts he was unable to build muscle or lose weight.

He was officially diagnosed with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (testosterone deficiency) 2 May 2012 by his treating endocrinologist, Dr. Barry Cohan. 
 
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of master sergeant (E-7).

On 13 Dec 11, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained an unsatisfactory composite score of 61.20.  

The medical records show that he was seen at the Malmstrom AFB Clinic on 25 Jan 12 for decreased libido and other symptoms. 
He received lab results on 7 Feb 12, which revealed low testosterone. 

He had a follow-up appointment on 2 Mar 12 and the testosterone level was "normal" on the second test and therefore was not treated with the use of testosterone. 

He expressed concern of an underlying issue that was not detected as his weight continued to increase in spite of dieting and regular exercise. 

He was diagnosed with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and prescribed testosterone injections.

The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows:

Date 
Composite Score
Rating
19 Sep 13
77.40
Satisfactory 
20 Mar 13
79.30
Satisfactory
11 Sep 12
86.70
Satisfactory
12 Mar 12
77.10
Satisfactory
*13 Dec 11
61.20
Unsatisfactory

* Contested FA

On 2 Jan 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of “Insufficient evidence; specifically no commander invalidation.”

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, if an Airman becomes injured or ill during the FA and is unable to complete all required components, he/she will have the option of being evaluated at the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) but his/her test will still count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander within five days of the assessment.  If the medical evaluation validates the illness/injury, the Unit Commander may invalidate the test results.  The Airman will then be required to retest within five duty days or when capable based on the recommendations of the medical provider and the Exercise Physiologist (EP).

In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas:  Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit-ups completed within one minute each).  

________________________________________________________________






AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request for removal of FA dated 13 Dec 11 due to lack of supporting evidence and invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submitted a personal statement and a letter from his commander requesting that the applicant’s FA on 13 Dec 2011 be invalidated. 

A complete copy of the applicant’s response is at Exhibit D.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we believe he has met his burden of establishing the contested FA should be declared void.  The FAAB disapproved the request, stating that there was no commander invalidation letter and AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the request due to a lack of supporting evidence; however, we disagree.  In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant has since provided a letter from his commander supporting his claim and requesting the contested FA be invalidated.  Additionally, he has provided medical documentation, including a letter from his medical provider, validating that his medical condition precluded him from passing the contested FA.  Given the evidence before us, it is apparent the applicant’s ability to successfully complete the FA was hindered by an illness/injury.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Fitness Assessment, dated 13 Dec 2011 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System.
________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01586 in Executive Session on 27 Mar 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Ms. XXXXXXXXXXX, Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXXXXX, Vice Chair
	Ms. XXXXXXXXXXX, Member

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The following documentary evidence was considered:

     Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Mar 13, w/atchs.
     Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 11 Dec 13 w/atchs.
     Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jan 14.
	



                                   XXXXXXXXXXX
                                   Chair	




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03392

    Original file (BC 2013 03392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B. While the applicant has not provided a letter from his commander invalidating the FA, he has provided an AF Form 108 signed by his medical provider stating that he did in fact have a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA. Therefore, the majority of the Board recommends the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01625

    Original file (BC 2013 01625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    According to the applicable regulation in regards to the date of the test, AFI 36-2905, members with a composite score <75 are considered “Unsatisfactory.” The applicant’s last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 7 Jun 2013 94.90 Excellent *11 Mar 13 74.30 Unsatisfactory 10 Dec 12 74.00 Unsatisfactory 28 Jun 12 85.90 Satisfactory 15 Dec 11 87.50 Satisfactory *Annotates Contested FA On 13 Mar 13, an AF FM 108 was signed by the applicants medical provider. On 16 Jan...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03350

    Original file (BC 2013 03350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSQ should be completed no earlier than 30 calendar days, but no later than 7 days prior to FA to provide time for medical evaluation, when indicated; however, failure to complete FSQ does not invalidate the FA. On 7 Apr 14 the applicant submitted a letter from his commander, with attachments, requesting that the contested FA be removed from the record (Exhibit C). However, in response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submits a letter from his commander requesting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05139

    Original file (BC 2013 05139.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05139 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 15 Aug 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235

    Original file (BC 2013 03235.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01802

    Original file (BC 2013 01802.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s last eight FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 13 Nov 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) 9 May 13 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU) *25 Mar 13 33.33 Unsatisfactory (Exempt from PU) *12 Dec 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 28 Jun 12 100 Excellent (Exempt from Cardio/PU/SU) *19 Mar 12 - Removed by FAAB 22 Jan 14 2 Aug 11 84.70 Satisfactory 28 Apr 11 77.90 Unsatisfactory (minimum SU) * Contested FA In accordance with guidance at the time of contested...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605

    Original file (BC 2013 04605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04196

    Original file (BC 2013 04196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommend invalidation of FA in question.” A similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis the applicant should not have completed the FA due to injury. NOTE: Original FA will count unless rendered invalid by the Unit Commander.” In accordance with guidance at the time of contested FA, AFI 36-2905 (1 Jul 10), Paragraph 2.3.2., “All members must complete the FSQ prior to FA (Attachment 4).” In accordance with guidance at the time of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05872

    Original file (BC 2013 05872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her appeal the applicant submits a personal memorandum to the board and a letter from her commander requesting the contested FA be invalidated. At the time the application was submitted, the applicant had not exhausted all available avenues of administrative relief prior to seeking correction of military records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Apr 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05079

    Original file (BC 2013 05079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicant’s request to remove the contested FA, citing the lack of supporting documents, specifically a commander’s letter. While we note an invalidation letter from the commander was not submitted, we recognize the applicant’s medical provider indicated on the AF Form 108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing, that he did in fact have a medical...